subject
English, 11.04.2021 01:00 morris9878

The following transcript comes from the monumental 1966 case of Miranda vs. the State of Arizona. The result of this case required police officers to inform anyone being arrested of his or her rights to an attorney. Read the statement and then answer the question that follows: Now, may I just state what the thrust of our position is, very briefly, before indicating likewise its limits and why we are taking this position? Our contention is that insofar as these cases present a constitutional claim that a valid confession cannot be taken unless counsel is present or has been waived, that that claim in constitutional terms in the constitutional dimension is not sound. In other words, Justice Black's question we would answer in the negative. The Fifth Amendment cannot, and should not, be read as requiring counsel to be present at the time the confession is taken. I will come to my reasons for that very presently. […]

In the Miranda case that's just been argued, there is obviously division of opinion about the characteristics of the defendant about whether the warning which Mr. Justice Fortas' questions were directed to was given at a meaningful stage—what the significance of that warning is, in legal terms. […]

Secondly, may I make it quite clear that we are not saying that new rules about requiring counsel to be present when an investigation is taken—when an interrogation is made or a confes¬sion taken—we are not saying that such rules are necessarily unwise, without merit. We say that these are not matters of constitutional dimension. But we do not say that they might not be very wise rules to adopt. In fact, we are saying that this whole problem of the assistance of counsel at the pre-arraignment stage can, we think, be more appropriately and perhaps better dealt with in the legislative dimension and in the area of judicial policy, rather than on purely constitutional terms.

In one paragraph of five to eight sentences, evaluate whether the statement is effective in terms of logos. Use evidence from the statement to support your answer. Use proper spelling and grammar.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 07:50
Which of the following best describes a writing style authors use to convey a satirical tone?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:00
What food does bottom want? a. nuts c. fruit b. hay d. milk
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:00
Ineed . identify the item that shows sharp and vivid details rather than vague and general ones (put a or b for your answer.) a. my brother doesn’t know the value of money. he buys new things, even though his old ones are still perfectly good. he recently took his girlfriend on a trip. they stayed at a nice hotel and ate all their meals out. while they were there, he proposed marriage to her and gave her an engagement ring. b. my brother bought a new car this year, even though his last car was only three years old and running well. he recently took his girlfriend to hawaii for a week. they stayed at a hilton hotel right on the beach and ate dinner by candlelight in elegant gourmet restaurants. on their last night there, he surprised her with a two-carat diamond ring.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:00
How do sotomayor’s descriptions of her family most likely affect readers? they show readers how latina families decorate their homes. they give readers images of the importance of family. they describe the struggle sotomayor endured in becoming a judge. they give readers feelings of hopelessness and desperation.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The following transcript comes from the monumental 1966 case of Miranda vs. the State of Arizona. Th...
Questions
question
Biology, 25.04.2020 05:23
question
Biology, 25.04.2020 05:23
question
History, 25.04.2020 05:23
question
Mathematics, 25.04.2020 05:23
question
Mathematics, 25.04.2020 05:23
question
Mathematics, 25.04.2020 05:23
Questions on the website: 13722360