While the attack on Pearl Harbor was in doubtfully devastating, Do you think it was necessary for Japan to take this action? Did Japan have the right to attack the United States in response to the United States sanctions (punishments). Do you think that Japan should've acted differently, if so how? ( 5-7 sentences )  I’ll mark best answe as brainliest

I do not think that it was necessary for Japan to attack Pearl Harbor, killing 2,403 U.S. personnel, including 68 civilians. While I do believe that Japan should have taken some type of action, I do not think they should have attack Pearl Harbor for several reasons. Japan should have definitely acted differently, by either talking it out with the United States of America, or coming to some type of decision with America.

- "the answers are a and b.  

when cullen speaks of planting while others reap, and standing "abject and mute," he is speaking about the racial injustices present in american society. as these injustices have changed over time, the american identity  has also shifted. those changes are, in turn, reflected in american literature."

answer: more info pls

explanation: