In paragraph 3, the author of the article quotes Erika. Erika explains how her teammates convinced her to go explicit reasons did her teammates give? O Her teammates gave zero explicit reasons. Her teammates gave one explicit reason. Long O Her teammate gave two explicit reasons. Her teammates gave three explicit reasons ​

Clearly show? ramona: anna, where does the theme seem to change? anna: according the article: "the fault lies with the fda's inability to release enough information in order to regain the public's trust. but perhaps japan is to blame as well. although there are plans to remove the spent nuclear fuel rods and build a permafrost wall around the four damaged reactors, is this really enough to recover damaged trust? " and then sato goes on to explain this statement. o a. challenging established ideas o b. using evidence to support your conclusions o c. asking clarifying questions o d. synthesizing claims into a single conclusion

Nsilent spring rachel carson makes up a fictional story about what life in the united states will be like if we don't save the environment, whereas in "save the redwoods" john muir?

Which sentence is an example of a paradox