Which of the following does not seem like a way to narrow your topic? Choosing a particular population to focus on Choosing a particular area of the world to focus on Choosing a particular subject like "healthcare' to focus on Choosing a particular time period to focus on​

Choosing a particular subject like "healthcare' to focus on

Explanation:

There are various ways to narrow the scope of a research topic such as choosing a particular population, time period, location in the world and causes and the like. This will enable the research to be easier to do and cheaper as well.

Choosing a particular subject will not necessarily narrow a topic because the topic is most likely under a subject as well. Basing it again on a subject would broaden the scope as subjects are general in nature.

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

what can i you with?