subject
English, 25.03.2021 01:00 aaroneduke8933

The Liquid Transmitter It was March 10, 1876. Alexander Graham Bell stared down at this latest device. It was called the liquid transmitter. The 23-year-old inventor
hoped it would not be called a failure, but the odds weren't good. He had been working on his device for a few years now, but he had not succeeded
yet in the meantime, Samuel Morse's telegraph was extremely popular. What the idea of sending voices was impossible?
Nevertheless, Bell went ahead with the plan. He stared at his liquid transmitter and said into it. "Mr. Watson, come here-want you."
From down the hal 22-year-old Thomas Watson stood wide-eyed over the deite He could not believe it was it possible Hadhe
imagined
Watson had heard every word-crisp and clear-come out of the liquid transmitter in front of him. This was one of the most amazing moments
of Watson's young te He and Bell had actually invented a device that could send the human voice across distances. The impossible had become
possible in an instant, and that meant that the possities were endless.
Which statement best describes how the author introduces Watson to the reader?
O 1. The author defines the relationship between Watson and Bell
O 2 The author emphasizes Watson's role in a successful outcome.
3. The author focuses on Watson's reaction to the events that take place
O
4. The author creates a contrast between the personalities of Watson and Bell

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 22:00
Will anyone be able to check for grammatical errors and give an opinion on the essay itself? write about the following topic: some people believe that allowing children to make their own cholces on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them. discuss both these views and give your own opinion. —— nowadays, in this busy and fast developing world teaching children from an early age to cope with their own decisions (such as food, clothes etc.) and then take the coincidences after that is something that a lot of people believe that it is important for them. on the other hand other people think that it might end up in a society of humans who put their wishes before anyone else's. but which one of these views will predominate? firstly, the people who allow their children to make their own decisions are the people who everyone should look up to. it is important to let your children learn from the mistakes their make. the parents can not be with them all the time every day and for that reason, teaching them to deal with their decisons or even problems will them in the future. of course, there are always disadvantages such as some people may really forget about that their children will need them at a certain point in life and may loose connection whit them. but that is why it should have that moderately path, where kids will make their own decisions but will feel comfortable to always ask for a advice tueur parents. on the other hand, there are and the second type of parents which think that too much individualism is not good. it really depends on the parents how they will teach their children to carry on with the independence they have. a lot of them might forget that they are still kids and will need and advices from time to time and because of that the parents turn their kids in individuals who only think about their own wishes due to the fact that they are let on their own and have to cope with everyone and everything by themselves. in conclusion, i think that the best decision someone can make is to look up to the first type of parents. that way they will be able to train their children to become independent people who will respect the wishes of others and they will be able to cope with their decisions in the future when they need it.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 00:00
Time is not always change. time can also mean continuity, and it can mean keeping acknowledged truths in mind despite differences in circumstances.there is no better example of this in things fall apart than the retellings of the proverb about the bird named eneke, the language in both retellings is almost identical despite the length of time that has passed between their repetitions. in comparing the usages of the same proverb, achebe allows his readers to note the similarities and differences between the situations, and he them understand how this story can be applied to their own lives.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
Read the excerpt from the land. of my brothers, i was closest with robert. i suppose, in part, being the same year's children made us close, but there were other things too. we had been together practically since birth, and we always took care of each other. when i got into trouble, robert was there to pull me out of it if he could, or at least to see me through it, and i did the same for him. the passage provides evidence of why paul and robert have physical conflicts. paul and robert avoid social conflicts. paul is the least influenced by robert. paul is motivated to ask robert for .
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:10
Which counter claim is most effective against this claim? rob's essay includes
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The Liquid Transmitter It was March 10, 1876. Alexander Graham Bell stared down at this latest devi...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 29.11.2021 07:20
question
Mathematics, 29.11.2021 07:20
question
English, 29.11.2021 07:20
Questions on the website: 13722367