If you were arguing with your parents to increase your allowance, what points would you make to support your argument? How would you present your argument?

i would try to not scream and be calm with them

Explanation:

they tend to expolde if you don't give them respect

I would just say that I think I should get more money bc the current amount just isn't enough, and then while they're thinking you just ramble out a bunch of words about each and every little thing you do, this'll over burden their mind while they're already thinking whether or not to give you more money, this makes them give up and say yes without thinking twice

Explanation:

adults are old and simple minded, take advantage of that :D

follow me on spotify it'll be greatly appreciated

spotify:user:v78bm1iqw63wfu77gz0zxfgtt

the servant does not kill the child oedipus as he was ordered to do because "he pitied the child" based on the oedipus rex story. the servant was ordered to kill the child because of the prophecy that predicted king laius' death. the king already had attempted to hurt oedipus by piercing oedipus's ankle. however, the servant did not finish the job and he rather saved the baby oedipus.

explanation:

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."