What statement best suggests how the narrator of “The Second Coming" and Don Quixote differ? The narrator has an unbiased viewpoint while his misunderstanding often misleads Don Quixote.
The narrator and Don Quixote differ only in their methods of fighting.
The narrator sees the loss of innocence as the greatest possible loss while Quixote sees the loss if personal liberty as the greatest
possible loss.
The narrator sees a violent confrontation as he unleashes a beast while Quixote believe the violent confrontation can correct an
injustice.

paine is arguying that they had tried everything before coming to the conclusion that they needed to fight for their freedom.

argument: "every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual."

claim 1: "our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petitioning and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the kings of europe absolute."

claim 2: "wherefore, since nothing but blows will do, for god’s sake, let us come to a final separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of parent and child."

c. spelling errors, if not i am so sorry. but i hope it !

nautre

nature is sure to be the best thing on earth

the sunshine and beauty is sure to be worth

this can't be sold

for any money or gold

because nature is strongly beautiful and is the best thing to happen on earth

may i see the passage?