Read the passage. Then answer the question. Excerpt from Clarence Darrow's closing argument in Illinois v. Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb, August 22-25,1924" (Question---> What is Darrow's argument in this excerpt? How well does Darrow support his argument? Use evidence from the text to support your response. Your response should be at least one or two complete paragraphs. ( You'll have to expand the picture to read it) Will Mark Brainliest. ​

Answer and Explanation:

Darrow argues that exorbitant amounts of money were used by the families of the boys involved in the crime to influence the outcome of the trial. In fact, Darrow claims that the amounts of money not only influenced the outcome of the trial, but also decided it completely, as we can see from the paragraph "No lawyer could have justified it. No prosecution could have justified it. We could have come into this court without evidence, without argument, with nothing, and this court would have given to us what every judge in the city of Chicago has given to every boy in the city of Chicago since the first capital case was tried. . "

In this case, Darrow shows how money often hinders the free execution of things, which is contradictory, since we usually think that money will solve things. With this reasoning, Darrow shows that not only is judgment hindered by money, but public opinion and meddling in judgment, which can often attract more than help, since the public has a strong interest when wealthy families are involved in such a scandal.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

answer: i have found the same question on

maybe this might .

good luck.