In the call of the wild, buck did not fight back when hal was beating, him because?
my answer is that he did not have the strengh

Because he was tired and did not have the strength to fight back.

Explanation:

Jack London's "The Call Of The Wild" tells the story of a dog named Buck and his life from being a pet to being a creature of the wild. It is a sort of the life experience of Buck, his growing into a whole different being.

Chapter V "The Toil of Trace And Trail" tells the scene where Buck and the other dogs were travelling with their new master Hal, Charles and his wife Mercedes. The ignorant Hal had been driving them hard to keep on going, eve though the dogs were underfed, overworked and tired. But even with the constant nagging and beating, Hal still continued to beat the dogs. But Buck did not fight back as he was out of energy and strength. He just let Hal beat him even though he so wanted to fight back for he had been drained of his energy along the whole journey.

hey there

use of language is very important in order to write in a good way. each literary genre has its different exploitation of language and, therefore, many differences and similarities can emerge. shakespeare's work (romeo and juliet) is a sample of a drama. its language is full of dialogue to describe the beauty of first love in people; everything it's pink color. it briefly describes fictional scenes and situations. on the other hand, the calypso borealis, by john muirs, it's narrative essay: its language is full of descriptions to describe an experience, a real experience. hyperbole is not used as in drama genre. he falls in love with discovering a real place and his direct feelings.

hope this !

f yes, , mark brainliest : )

have a good night.

can you take a picture of the passage