Below: 1. What is the author's main claim (arguable statement) in ARTICLE 2?
2. What is a reason the author gives to support this claim?
3. What is a RELEVANT (on topic) piece of evidence (fact or example) that the author
gives to support this reason? Quote from the text and explain.
4. Where and how does the author acknowledge and respond to the other side's point
of view in this text? Quote from the text and explain.
5. What SPECIFIC POINTS do these two texts disagree upon? List below and explain.:

science.

modern problems require modern solutions.

2b2t

explanation:

2b2t

i could of w this question but i don't see a " passage " .

~

sorry ! ):

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.