"Ode to a Nightingale" by john keats Thinking About the Selection
1. (a) Recall: low does the speaker describe his emotional state in
sanat (b) Infert What appears to have brought on this state!
2. (a) Recalli What wish does the speaker express in lines 19-20
(1) Compare and Contrast: What differences does he see
berween the bird's life and his own that cause him to wish this!
1. (a) Analyse: What is the viewpoint from which the speaker
descubes his surroundings in stanza V? (b) Connect: How does
the viewpoint reflect the speaker's wish in line 217
4. (a) Analyze: How does stanza VII "answer" stanza VI?
(b) Synthesise: What similarity between death and immortality
does the speaker imply?
5. Make a Judgment By writing a poem full of extreme feeling,
is Keats just being dramatic, or is writing such a poem a way
of making peace with strong feelings? Explain.

Which sentence best describes the biased way the author approaches this topic? boars = bacon. and gammon, chops, sausages and feel your salivary glands begin to tingle at the thought of your teeth sinking into that first tender mouthful, and you will be half way towards a sensible attitude towards these creatures. they’re pigs. porkers, hogs, swine, if you will. they dig up people’s gardens, occasionally attack their dogs, spread disease and generally cause a nuisance. in culinary terms, they’re no different to cows or sheep or any of the other feeble-minded, four-legged frolickers which, in various pasties, pies and other assorted pastry cases, end up on our steaming plates on a daily basis. low in fat but high in deliciousness, by eating a wild boar you aren’t depriving poor little peppa and george of a long-lost cousin, but rather reaffirming your god-given position at the top of the food chain. if a boar could eat you it would, thus i say we should return the favour with interest. so say no to the misty-eyed squealers and man up, tuck in and pig out!

Will give if correct read the passage first of all, if someone says your dream is impossible, they’re wrong. you can’t prove that something is impossible-all you know is that [it] hasn’t been done yet. people said no one could scale mount everest, but in 1953, sir edmund hilary and tenzing norgay gazed down upon the world from its summit. people said that man could not fly, but in 1903, orville and wilbur wright made the first sustained powered flight in a heavier-than-air machine. people said, “okay, we admit that someone could climb mount everest, and we admit that man has learned to fly, but no one will ever, ever walk on the face of the moon.” if we can send three men a quarter of a million miles away and bring them home safely, is there any great task we cannot accomplish? which identifies the textual evidence that best supports the claim: the authors purpose is to persuade? a: the author shares historical information about the wright brothers. b: the author states that men have walked the moon. c: the author states that others who think your dreams are impossible are wrong. d: the author wants to know what tasks we cannot accomplish.

Which is these is not a benefit of parallel structure? a)clarity b)classification c)emphasis d)balance