Can someone analyze this poem? silently if, out of not knowable
night’s utmost nothing, wanders a little guess
(only which is this world) more of my life does
not leap than with the mystery your smile
sings or if (spiraling as luminous
they climb oblivion)voices who are dreams,
less into heaven certainly earth swims
than each my deeper death becomes your kiss
losing through you what seemed myself;i find
selves unimaginably mine;beyond
sorrow’s own joys and hoping’s very fears
yours is the light by which my spirit’s born:
yours is the darkness of my soul’s return
–you are my sun, my moon, and all my stars
(- e. e )

The voice of your eyes is deeper than all rose” The poem Somewhere I have never travelled and Silently if, out of not knowable, are written by eminent and renowned poets called Edwards Estlin has written numerous poems in his time and his poems have inspired several readers across the globe. was one of the most famouspoets in the 20thCentury, and history has it that he wrote about 3,000 poems in his lifetime. The poet is known for his brilliant and smart use of various literary devices in his poems, which madehis poems outstanding. The two poems are centered in the realm of love, the poet is using various literary device and techniques to describe his endless and inexpressible love for an undisclosed lover. Narrator tried to narrate his deep romantic emotion through the two unique poems. The two poems revolve around love, the narrator took advantage of the same literary devices as simile, personification, imagery, alliteration and more to enhance his work; however, the two poems are also varied in the use of literary devices like personification, anaphora and theuse of the first person.First and foremost, to one cannot compare the two poems without lamenting on the majorsimilarity which they have in common, which is the theme. The two poems revolve around the central idea which is love. In both poems, the narrator used the first-person voice to “I” to narratethe poem; however, the narrator is not necessarily trying to be individualistic or personalistic

alright, so here, the author clearly thinks that flooding the canyon was a bad idea and is showing bias against it.

we need the passage first