In a paragraph or two, write about 100 to 150 words describing the discussion. Include responses to these questions as they apply: How balanced was participation in the discussion? What questions did other participants in the group ask you? What did you answer? Did other participants oppose or support your thesis or raise new insights about the topic? Describe how. Did participating in the discussion change your analysis of the story? Describe how. What would you change about the discussion, if anything, and why?

Which of the fallowing is true about plays

Ineed quick me on this one and others

Read the passage first of all if someone says your dream is impossible, they’re wrong. you can’t prove that something is impossible-all you know is that[it] hasn’t been done yet. people said no one could scale mount everest but in 1953, sir edmund hilary and tenzing norway gazed down upon the world from it’s summit. people said that man could not fly, but in 1903, orville and wilbur wright made the first sustained powered flight in a heavier-than-air machine. people said, “okay, we admit that someone could climb mount everest, and we admit that man has learned to fly, but no one will ever, ever walk on the face of the moon.” if we can send three men a quarter of a million miles away and bring them home safely, is there any great task we cannot accomplish? which identifies the textual evidence that best supports the claim: the authors purpose is to persuade? a: the author shares historical information about the wright brothers. b: the author states that men have walked the moon. c: the author states that others who think your dreams are impossible are wrong. d: the author wants to know what tasks we cannot accomplish.