Which claim best responds to the writing prompt? Writing prompt:
In 1945, the United States dropped atomic bombs on the cities of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Some historians say that these
attacks ended the war. Other historians say that Japan would have
surrendered anyway. Do you think the dropping of atomic bombs was
justified? Support your reasoning.
A. The dropping of atomic bombs on Japan was justified because
there was no guarantee that Japan would have surrendered
otherwise.
B. Some historians think that millions more Americans and Japanese
would have died had the United States invaded Japan instead of
dropping the bombs.
C. Over 200,000 Japanese people were likely killed because of the
atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and many more
were wounded.
D. There are arguments for and against the dropping of atomic
bombs on Japan, and it is not clear if the United States was
justified in using such weapons.

hello, never fear the humanspider is here!

answer: this is what i could find because i never done this work before.

it's likely the answer would be c.

- a - you could speak slowly, but if you used the same humor and a higher complexity or the same level of complexity, they might understand what to do.

- b - the humor presented might not be understandable to the 1st graders.

- d - explaining where peanut butter comes from is irrelevant to the homeeco class.

**c - by adjusting the level of complexity, you are going to a point of talking where everybody understands you, if you what i'm saying.**

note: if you loved this answer click that cool mark brainliest button buddy!

~

your friendly neighborhood human spider.

the apollo program, also known as project apollo, was the third united states human spaceflight program carried out by the national aeronautics and space administration (nasa), which succeeded in landing the first humans on the moon from 1969 to 1972.

impartial means: treating all rivals or disputants equally; fair and just.

i would say that impartial is agreeing with something, because impartial means to treat your rivals, arguments, and reasoning equally and fair. so if you rival says something, agreeing on it means you did the impartial.