Which of the following is the hook? Question 2 options:

The regulations that the government is presenting would help save lives, it would slow down the obesity epidemic, decrease the possibility of heart disease, as well as minimize the risk of cancer in children and adults. The decision is clear as day, the government should be able to implement regulations on what we eat, for the sake of personal health.

This shows the grave importance of the issue at hand. The regulations that the government is presenting would help save lives, it would slow down the obesity epidemic, decrease the possibility of heart disease, as well as minimize the risk of cancer in children and adults.

It would help combat serious health issues like obesity, diabetes, and heart disease, as well as lower the risk for illnesses such as cancer. The beneficial changes that these regulations would cause, outweighs the argument given by the opposition. Government regulation of what we eat and drink is not only fair but worthwhile.

Government regulations have historically been implemented to benefit the people of the United States. The Clean Air Act of 1970 for example, was put in place to control air pollution on a national level, as well as provide a healthier and cleaner living environment for the people of the United States of America. The most recent regulation which has ignited a fierce debate is whether or not the government should be able to place regulations on what we eat and drink.