Part A Based on details in "Washed-up Plastics Become Art With a Vital Message," what inference can be made?

It can be difficult for Pozzi to find material for her art.

Freshwater animals suffer the most harm from plastics.

Animals eat plastic because they mistake it for food.

People only dispose of items of little value
Part B

Which evidence from the text best supports the answer to Part A?

"'People are talking about plastics and the Great Lakes and the waterways in a way that we were hoping for but not really sure it would happen,' she said."

"An army of about 10,000 volunteers in Oregon help her collect, prepare and assemble the beach trash into art."

"A fish made entirely of fish-bitten plastic is among the pieces to be added in October."

"She wants the size of her creations to help people to realize just how much plastic gets washed into the oceans."

answer: you

explanation: because you posted this stupid question xd

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

what does the teacher mean

98 points!

assignment

analyzing characters

respond to the following questions in one paragraph for each. use specific examples from the text to support your responses.

1. there is a set of twins on the island named sam and eric. however, when describing them, golding regularly refers to them as samneric. how does this way of describing the twins relate to their behavior and the way that readers understand their characters? what examples of their behavior readers see that samneric is really the appropriate way to refer to them?

2. as the boys set out to search for the beast, ralph allows jack to lead the way, and he sinks to the back of the pack, " to have escaped responsibility for a time." what does this moment lead you to infer about ralph and about his feelings about being the group’s leader? what does this moment foreshadow?

3. while part of the party searching for the beast, simon realizes that the notion of the beast that the other boys have does not make sense. a beast sitting atop a mountain with claws, a beast who did not leave tracks, could have easily caught the twins. simon has a different picture of the beast: "there rose before his inward sight the picture of a human at once heroic and sick." how does this picture relate to the beast that samneric saw? how does it relate to what simon said earlier about the beast being "only us"?

no plagarism

me