Project You have studied many different kinds of non-market distribution methods, including majority rule, contests, force, first-come/first-served, sharing equally, lottery, and personal characteristics. In this project, you will explore one of these types of non-market distribution methods within a real-life setting.

Step 1) Choose one of the distribution methods listed above. There are seven kinds of methods listed, but you only have to choose one.

Step 2) Write one or two paragraphs, of at least 150 words, explaining the distribution method that you have chosen. In your response, be sure to answer the following questions:
Who receives the good or service from this distribution method?
Who does not receive the good or service?
What are the advantages of this method?
What are the disadvantages of this method?
Is this method efficient (or not wasting resources)? Is it fair (or free from bias)?
Can your chosen method be used to distribute large amounts of goods and services to many people each day? Why or why not?
Step 3) Find an example of your chosen distribution method in the real world, such as in school, at the mall, or at home.

Step 4) In another one or two paragraphs, or at least 150 words, explain how your example uses this distribution method. Specifically mention, who receives the good or service and who does not, the advantages and disadvantages that you see from this method, and if the method was fair and efficient in your real-life example. Include a citation giving credit to where this information was found.

Be sure to use proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Your entire project should be at least 375 words in length and include a list of works cited.

the third one.

hope it

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.

the bazaar because it represents the inaccessible land of freedom to the narrator. mangan’s sister because she represents domesticity and routine to the narrator. the marketplace because it represents the suburban lifestyle to the narrator. the church because it represents spiritual healing and renewal to the narrator.

n arraignment is not a hearing to determine guilt or innocence. it is usually a criminal defendant's first appearance in court