Mikayla placed the dough on her right fist and then spins it into the air, trying to mimic the chef. What change should be made in sentence 3

This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:

What change should be made in sentence 3? (Mikayla placed the dough on her right hand and then spins it into the air, trying to mimic the chef.)

A. Insert a comma after "fist".

B. Change "then" to "than".

C. Change "spins" to "spun".

D. Change "it" to "them".

The change that should be made in sentence 3 is:

C. Change "spins" to "spun".

Explanation:

The sentence "Mikayla placed the dough on her right hand and then spins it into the air, trying to mimic the chef" is incorrect for only one reason - the shift in verb tenses. The sentence begins with a verb in the simple past and, all of a sudden, changes to the simple present. It is clear that this is a sequence of actions that took place in the past, one after the other, so the shift is inappropriate in this case. To correct it, we must change the verb in the present form (spins) to the past form (spun):

Mikayla placed the dough on her right hand and then spun it into the air, trying to mimic the chef.

answer: it means that he would rather write than preach.

explanation: its what it says

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.