How does Passage 2 transform the myth presented in Passage 1? O by including parts of the events and characters present in Passage 1
o by suggesting that Icarus has the same thoughts as the character in Passage 1
O by explaining what happened to Daedalus after he quit looking for Icarus in Passage 1
o by including modern objects that did not exist in the time period presented in Passage 1

D: By including modern objects that did no exist in the time period presented in passage 1

Explanation:

Passage 1 is set in 1325 BC, while passage 2 is set in the modern day in a suburb.

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.

the aesthetic impact is that moment when you are relating spatially to the target. the "ai" occurs when you have an impression that includes both you and the target and is usually a spatial relationship.