Read the following passage from an intercalary chapter of The Grapes of Wrath:
If you who own the things people must have could
understand this, you might preserve yourself. If you could
separate causes from results, if you could know that Paine,
Marx, Jefferson, Lenin, were results, not causes, you might
survive. But that you cannot know. For the quality of
owning freezes you forever into "1" and cuts you off forever
from the "we."
What is most likely to parallel this passage in a coming plot chapter?
A. An event in which migrant workers band together against a
singular oppressor
O B. An event in which an owner dies because he didn't read Paine and
Jefferson
O C. An event in which an owner shows generosity to migrant workers
O D. An event in which a farmer hires extra farmworkers

Isaw my future flash before me and it did not take me anytime to slow down. i need to replace the words "it did".

Athesis statement can be controversial

She took up a scalpel and slit the monkey's abdomen, making a slow and gentle cut, keeping the blade well away from her gloved fingers. the spleen was puffed up and tough, leathery, like a globe of smoked salami. she did not see any bloody lesions inside this monkey. she had expected that the monkey's interior would be a lake of blood, but no, this monkey looked all right, it had not bled into itself. if the animal had died of ebola, this was not a clear case. she opened up the intestine. there was no blood inside it. the gut looked okay. then she examined the stomach. there she found a ring of bleeding spots at the junction between the stomach and the small intestine. this could be a sign of ebola, but it was not a clear sign. it could also be a sign of simian fever, not ebola. therefore, she could not confirm the presence of ebola virus in this animal based on a visual inspection of the internal organs during necropsy.