What is ironic about Cassio and Iago gave their respective reputations? a. Cassio has fairly gained his reputation while Iago has fairly lost his reputation.
b. Cassio has fairly lost his reputation while Iago has fairly gained his reputation.
c. Cassio has unfairly gained his reputation while Iago has unfairly lost his reputation.
d. Cassio has unfairly lost his reputation while Iago has unfairly gained his reputation

the answer is: the start of world war i, and russia’s hopes of benefiting from it

during world war i russian joined due to in their current crisis they were being supported by france and the war was already declared to them by germany, they needed to maintain their political goal and leadership role in the balkans, and is the same feeling that this excerpt evoke the eager of maintain the land value.

the correct answer is option d. none of these. it is noted that options a, b, and c share the same content.

despite the valid answer provided at the last sentence of each of the options, a question/answer format shouldn't include humourous themed responses such as "you bet your thermal pj's we do." - unless of course, the answer is carried out in an informal environment. this could be replaced with a simple "yes" or "it is necessary".

the question should be re-phrased to a more appropiate syntaxis. instead of "do we need the greenhouse effect? ", it should be written as "is the greenhouse effect necessary? " in order to give it a general scope, instead of limiting the answer to the needs of "we" the humans.

rising action   i think i did this not sure