B. PART B: Which TWO details from the text best support the answers to Part A?
A.
"Then, as now, 'the guys' dominated tech and engineering. Like female coders in
today's diversity-challenged tech industry, Hamilton was an outlier." (Paragraph
5)
Software was not included in the schedule, and it was not included in the
budget.'Not at first, anyhow." (Paragraph 8)
C.
"Once the code was solid, it would be shipped off to a nearby Raytheon facility
where a group of women, expert seamstresses known to the Apollo program as
the 'Little Old Ladies" (Paragraph 11)
D
"Without it, Neil Armstrong wouldn't have made it to the moon. And without the
software written by Hamilton, Eyles, and the team of MIT engineers, the
computer would have been a dud." (Paragraph 13)
E. "Launching the P01 program had wiped out all the navigation data Lovell had
been collecting. That was a problem." (Paragraph 16)
F. "Software engineering, a concept Hamilton pioneered, has found its way from
the moon landing to nearly every human endeavor." (Paragraph 17)

a compare and contrast essay is a piece of formal writing in which the author focus on the similarities between two ideas, objects, places, etc., and the differences between them. there are some aspects that the author should take into account when he/she is crafting the essay. first, the author has a clear idea of the effect that he/she wants to produce on the audience (a purpose). his/her main idea should be presented in the thesis statement in a simple but effective way which gives the audience a clear idea of the content and the direction of the essay. in addition, it is also important to focus to the similarities and differences that not only are interesting and relevant to the reader but also provide a new, impressive point of view or deeper understanding of a topic.

b and d

explanation:

    resources

    news

workshop on enhancing communication around influenza vaccination (weeciv)

centers for disease control and prevention, atlanta, usa,

11-13 june 2013

context

investment in early intervention health care is a proven strategy to decrease high costs burdening the public and government sectors. by strengthening preparedness capacity and supporting low-cost preventative services, mortality rates and the health of populations can be significantly improved. over the past 6 years, considerable investments have been made to establish and expand influenza vaccine manufacturing capacity in developing countries. these investments have improved preparedness for seasonal and pandemic influenza, and have indirectly improved health systems, surveillance, detection, and response activities by leveraging additional support and building capacity within these countries and regions. to fully maximize investments and to ensure sustainability of influenza vaccine manufacturing in developing countries, there is a need to increase national and regional uptake of vaccination.

the percentage of who member states incorporating seasonal influenza vaccination into national immunization programs remains low with significant regional variations. high vaccine and service costs, competing health priorities, difficulties in measuring vaccine efficacy and cost–effectiveness, and adverse public opinion regarding vaccination all influence the policy decisions affecting national immunization programs.

effectively communicating the benefit of influenza vaccination is an essential component to increase the vaccine uptake and inclusion into national influenza immunization programmes. firstly, these benefits need to be understood by the key players that promote vaccination at national level (health promotion departments and healthcare workers). health care workers are increasingly important in influencing vaccination choices, and new appro