subject
English, 01.02.2021 23:50 amiechap12

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:


Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 19:10
Label the different parts of the stage. downstage stage left audience stage right upstage
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:30
Based on the information in the passage, what conclusion can the reader make?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:00
The rich natural resources made the sacramento valley a "garden of eden." permanent villages were established about 8,000 years ago.which choice combines these two sentences from paragraph two to achieve a coherent flow of ideas? a) the rich natural resources made the sacramento valley a "garden of eden" and permanent villages were established about 8,000 years ago. b) permanent villages were established about 8,000 years ago and the rich natural resources made the sacramento valley a "garden of eden." c) the rich natural resources made the sacramento valley a "garden of eden; " and so the permanent villages were established about 8,000 years ago. d) because of the rich natural resources which made the sacramento valley a ‘garden of eden,’ native americans established permanent villages there 8,000 years ago.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:00
2dogs and 2 humans how many people are there? animals are considered as people too?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:
...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2020 06:56
question
Biology, 24.02.2020 06:57
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2020 06:57
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2020 06:59
Questions on the website: 13722367