1. Is there power in withholding forgiveness? Explain 2. What do you actually "give" when you grant forgiveness?
3. Whose responsibility is it to forgive? Why?
4. Are there actions that are unforgivable? Like what?
I´M GIVING BRAINLIEST!!!

TW for abuse and mention of assault in 4th question!

Explanation:

1. There is power in forgiveness as withholding it leaves the person who seeks forgiveness wanting closure however you rejecting that leaves them feeling no closure and so they will do whatever you say to make it up to you in some cases.

2. When you grant forgiveness you give a person a feeling of closure and another chance to redeem themselves.

3. It is the victims responsibility to forgive because if the offender forgave themself that wouldn't make sense and the victim still has no closure.

4. Yes there are actions that can be considered unforgivable such as abuse or assault because if you mentally or physically traumatise someone then you do not have to forgive them because they have used you for their own pleasure at your expense and to most people that is unacceptable

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

rudy is the nazi ideal, unfortunately for the nazis his ideal comes in the form of jesse the complete opposite of those who embrace the idea of white supremacy. over the course of the novel, rudy learns that he wants nothing to do with the hitler youth, and because of this his parents are forced to make a bargain; rudy's father is forced into the military, so that his son can remain home.   both liesel and hans influence that young man that rudy becomes. following han's example, rudy puts aside his own hunger to risk his life so that the jewish prisoners might have bread to eat.