How well does the author address the counterclaim in Paragraph 1 that wind power is a passing trend incapable of doing the job of fossil fuels? The response is ineffective because the author does not immediately cite evidence to refute the counterclaim.

The response is ineffective because the author waits to address the counterclaim in Paragraph 7.

The response is effective because the author cites data from the American Wind Energy Association to refute the claim.

The response is effective because the author believes in the efficiency and power of wind as an energy source.

The statement that most accurately evaluates the author's response to the counterclaim that fossil fuels are less expensive than wind power is :

C)The response ineffectively addresses the counterclaim by arguing for the counterclaim when initially citing costs.

i used to know but i learned it a long time ago sorry

explanation:

an great real life example for the lottery principle is the real life lottery itself. it adheres to the lottery principle so much it's even called lottery. you apply for the lottery in the manner of getting a ticket and if you are lucky, the goods are distributed to you, in this case, the huge amounts of money. there are other real life example but this is the best one.