Argument: There should be higher fines for drivers who do not stop at red lights. Claim: Drivers will stop at red lights if they are fined for going through them. Which revision to the claim best supports the argument? Going through a red light is illegal. The current fines are generating a lot of money for the city. People do not feel safe on the street when they know drivers are not stopping at red lights. The current fines are not high enough to discourage drivers from going through red lights.

Either: Going through a red light is illegal

Or the fines are not high enough to discourage drivers to stop going through red lights.

Explanation:

Red lights are illegal and it’s a big deal but your argument is also about fines.

D

Explanation:

my answer is the spanish won

in the 1890s, southern states enacted a new form of black codes, called “jim crow” laws. these laws made it illegal for blacks and whites to share public facilities. this meant that blacks and whites had to use separate schools, hospitals, libraries, restaurants, hotels, bathrooms, and drinking fountains.

explanation: