We all like judging the covers of books do we not? When was the last time you judged a book, someone or something, by its cover? I know for me it hasn’t been that long ago. But we also like judging pictures too right? Well I bet I can judge a movie clip and a picture and compare the two. Can you? If you can you have to follow these steps. Also you are gonna have to do it in paragraph form. 1. Introductory paragraph with a claim (Which medium is more effective? Equal?)
2. Two body paragraphs in which you prove your claim. You MUST use specific references to the mediums (video and still image) to prove your claim.
3. A concluding statement that sums up your argument.

Announcer two: ladies and gentlemen, following on the news given in our bulletin a moment ago, the government meteorological bureau has requested the large observatories of the country to keep an astronomical watch on any further disturbances occurring on the planet mars. due to the unusual nature of this occurrence, we have arranged an interview with noted astronomer professor pierson, who will give us his views on the event. in a few moments we will take you to the princeton observatory at princeton, new jersey. we return you until then to the music of ramón raquello and his orchestra. the passage is from the transcript of the radio adaptation of the war of the worlds by h. g. wells. instead of including expert interviews, h. g. wells uses a narrator to tell about an alien invasion that occurred a few years earlier. by including expert interviews, how does the radio broadcast change the story most effectively? o.a. it puts the story in the past tense, increasing its personal tone. o o b. it makes the broadcast sound more like a fictional story. o o c. it makes the broadcast sound like a news report. o d. it makes the story sound less believable by changing who presents the story's details.