subject
English, 19.01.2021 20:30 NetherisIsTheQueen

Please help I don't have much time 40 points
The old man took up his pen sometime in March of 1790 and began to write. As he had done so many times before, he addressed a serious topic by turning it upside down: Rather than attack slavery, Benjamin Franklin defended it, but by writing in the voice of an Algerian who supported the enslavement of white Christians. Franklin wrote the piece, under the name of Historicus, as a letter to the editor of the Philadelphia newspaper Federal Gazette. He was responding to a congressional debate that had been prompted by a petition from the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery and the Relief of Free Negroes Unlawfully Held in Bondage. Franklin was the society’s president. The petition had asked that Congress “countenance the Restoration of Liberty to those unhappy Men, who alone in this land of Freedom, are degraded into perpetual Bondage.” Several congressmen spoke out against the petition, most prominently Georgia’s James Jackson, and Congress eventually ruled that the Constitution prevented it from interfering with slavery. So Franklin, 84 years old and ailing, prepared his final piece of public writing. “Reading last night in your excellent Paper the speech of Mr. Jackson in Congress against their meddling with the Affair of Slavery,” it began, “it put me in mind of a similar One made about 100 Years since by Sidi Mehemet Ibrahim, a member of the Divan of Algiers, which may be seen in Martin’s Account of his Consulship, anno 1687.” In fact, the speech couldn’t be seen anywhere, as Franklin made the whole thing up. But he helpfully provided a translation of Ibrahim’s remarks. “If we forbear to make Slaves of their People, who in this hot Climate are to cultivate our Lands? Who are to perform the common Labours of our City, and in our Families? Must we not then be our own Slaves?” Jackson had cited the Bible to buttress his support for slavery. Sidi Mehemet Ibrahim relied on the Koran. It didn’t take a particularly astute reader to note the parallels. Franklin died less than a month later, with the abolition of slavery still 75 years and a civil war away. His campaign, the last one in a career filled with great campaigns, remained unfinished. It was also one that Franklin had embarked on late in life, the final step in the long transformation he made from slave owner to abolitionist.

a. What is his primary purpose?

b. What does "embarked" mean?

c. What is the purpose of the petition to Congress mentioned in the italicized print?

d. In the line “the enslavement of white Christians” (lines 19–31), what did Franklin hope to accomplish?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 01:30
What is the value of x in the equation? 43 7 x − 31 2 = 12 a) 32 5 b) 31 2 c) 33 4 d) 36 7
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:30
Read this excerpt from i never had it made. "it's all that ought to count," he replied. "but it isn't. maybe one of these days it will be all that counts. that is one of the reasons i've got you here, robinson. if you're a good enough man, we can make this a start in the right direction. but let me tell you, it's going to take an awful lot of courage." he was back to the crossroads question that made me start to get angry minutes earlier. he asked it slowly and with great care. "have you got the guts to play the game no matter what happens? " "i think i can play the game, mr. rickey," i said. the next few minutes were tough. branch rickey had to make absolutely sure that i knew what i would face. beanballs would be thrown at me. i would be called the kind of names which would hurt and infuriate any man. i would be physically attacked. could i take all of this and control my temper, remain steadfastly loyal to our ultimate aim? which is the central idea of this excerpt?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:20
What is most likely the speaker's intent in this excerpt from the speech "solitude of self" by elizabeth cady stanton?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 11:00
Instructions: the following argument argues for advertising to children. read the argument and answer the question that follows: topic and question advertising: should companies be allowed to advertise to children? ineffective argument i think that advertising to children is necessary. how else will we know what we can buy? i think that children are not aware of the products that are available. most children don’t own cars and can’t drive to stores to look around. the only way we know what we can buy is by seeing advertisements on tv. my friend really likes advertisements, too. he said, "how will we know what to buy if we don’t see advertisements? " seriously, children are consumers, too. we know what we like and we ask our parents to buy these products for us. i know that i like certain cereals, but how would i know that if i did not see advertisements? i love those commercials! kids are people, too. why is the argument ineffective? in a paragraph of 7–10 complete sentences, explain why the following parts of the argument are ineffective, and how they can be improved: claim support conclusion clincher point of view transitions
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Please help I don't have much time 40 points
The old man took up his pen sometime in March of...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 14.12.2021 17:10
question
Mathematics, 14.12.2021 17:20
Questions on the website: 13722363