Some would compare the Roaring 20s to an "Age of Intolerance." Which of the following BEST supports why one would compare the two?

The age of 20 is compared to the roaring in the age of intolerance as mostly the youthful multitude quite extend there assumption up to a matured being. There they blunder relative their dignity. They accept nothing harsh against their

conceptual understanding. Creates an ample egoism that inside intensify over ever truth. So they lack acceptance and mutual compromisation

. There no longer exist the line of value and virtue. Only to the insight of their daily work they understand what is explained before to them not what that is explained after what. Like evidently if from a childhood a man brought up in a chaos of peril disorder where bloodshed is only the solution the man inside in him will never understand the problem to deal with finding out other solution. Failure is not the option then, triumph is what they almost aspect every they pursue an argument.

are there answer choices to this particular question?

jaxsonmennessey27

jaxsonmennessey27