Please help me! Part A

What inference can be made about the story of Utnapishtim in the Newsela article “Flood Myths from Around the World”?

A. The family of Utnapishtim lives forever at the end of it.

B. Utnapishtim told his story of the flood to other cultures.

C. The story of Noah may have been influenced by it.

D. Utnapishtim is turned into a god at the end of it.

Question 2

Part B

Which evidence from the text best supports the answer to Part A?

A. “The people who wrote the Bible were Jewish, and their civilization had been conquered by the Assyrians and Babylonians of Mesopotamia.”

B. “He was allowed to live forever.”

C. “Utnapishtim did as he was instructed and filled the boat with valuables, his family and animals of all species.”

D. “Even so, almost every culture has its own surprisingly similar flood myth.”

C,C

Explanation:

sorry if its not correct you did not give us the book

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use   propaganda to achieve thir goals,   the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.

because he is using a description to provide evidence to support his argument.

hope this could