With a partner, reread the previous texts about Michael Fay and look for evidence of fallacious reasoning. Provide evidence for why you think the reasoning is fallacious, and discuss how the writers could have changed their text to avoid these problems.

It is possible to perceive a fallacy, when the text shows that the government of singapore affirmed that the western countries do not have the right to interfere and impose their values on governments that manage themselves.

Explanation:

As you may know, fallacies are arguments issued as correct, but which present false and incorrect information. An example of fallacy can be seen in the article on Michael Fa, when the government of Singapore states that Western countries do not have the right to interfere in the punishment of countries that govern themselves (as Singapore), when it comes to criminals.

This fallacy shows that the government of singapore, in the struggle to assume its incorrect position in relation to Fay, does not recognize its mistakes and puts other countries as wrong.

umm there is no difference

great question btw!

the sample answer on e2020

conflicting values are demonstrated between two different groups in animal farm. first, the farm animals value hard work. this is shown by them working late and working long hours at the request of the pigs. napoleon and the pigs, however, sleep late daily. furthermore, the animals value equality. this differs from the value of napoleon and the other pigs. instead of equality, they value only gaining power and maintaining their own privilege, which is demonstrated by their taking extra milk and sleeping in beds.