The following two documents related to women’s rights were written over twenty years apart. Read the documents and determine the order in which the documents were most likely written. Then explain your answers using evidence from the letters and your knowledge of history. Document A: Letter from Margaret Mead, a soon-to-be famous anthropologist, to her grandmother, discussing her decision to retain her maiden name after getting married. The Pressmans weren't a bit shocked at my keeping my own name. Mrs. Pressman . . . was perfectly willing to call me Margaret Mead. Document B: An account from the proceedings of the trial of Susan B. Anthony, tried on the charge of illegal voting in a presidential election. JUDGE HUNT: The Court must insist—the prisoner has been tried according to the established forms of law. MISS ANTHONY: Yes, your honor, but by forms of law made by men, interpreted by men, administered by men, in favor of men, and against women; and hence, your honor’s ordered verdict of guilty, against a United States citizen for the exercise of “that citizen’s right to vote,” simply because that citizen was a woman and not a man. GRADING RUBRIC: 4 Exceeds Standards Student correctly determines the order in which the documents were written AND justifies the answer with evidence from the documents AND uses an outside source (cited) to support the claim. (all sources cited) 3 Met Standards Student correctly determines the order in which the documents were written AND justifies the answer with evidence from the documents. (sources cited) 2 Approaching Standards Student places the documents in the correct order but provides minimal supporting evidence or provides an incomplete explanation. 1 Below Standards Student incorrectly orders the documents or does not provide a relevant explanation Flag this Question Question 1 50 pts Document was likely written first because Document was likely written later because Remember to follow directions, stating your claim using evidence from the letters , research, your knowledge of history and the reasoning as to how your evidence supports your claim (CER format). Failure to use complete sentences, proper grammar, conventions, etc. will result in the quiz earning a "0" and a comment telling you to redo and resubmit.

In what ways is crooks even more lonely than the other men on the ranch

Meter you are working as an apprentice for the bksb newcastle arena. an indoor sport exhibition is coming to the arena. your supervisor has asked you to set up a handball pitch and seating area as shown in the plan view below

Memories of a memory have you ever witnessed something amazing, shocking or surprising and found when describing the event that your story seems to change the more you tell it? have you ever experienced a time when you couldn't really describe something you saw in a way that others could understand? if so, you may understand why some experts think eyewitness testimony is unreliable as evidence in scientific inquiries and trials. new insights into human memory suggest human memories are really a mixture of many non-factual things. first, memory is vague. imagine your room at home or a classroom you see every day. most likely, you could describe the room very generally. you could name the color of the walls, the floors, the decorations. but the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. memory tends to save a blurry image of what we have seen rather than specific details. so when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall when faced with several tall people. there are lots of different kinds of "tall." second, memory uses general knowledge to fill in gaps. our brains reconstruct events and scenes when we remember something. to do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. for example, one day at a library you go to quite frequently, you witness an argument between a library patron and one of the librarians. later, when telling a friend about the event, your brain may remember a familiar librarian behind the desk rather than the actual participant simply because it is recreating a familiar scene. in effect, your brain is combining memories to you tell the story. third, your memory changes over time. it also changes the more you retell the story. documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. research has also shown that the more a witness's account is told, the less accurate it is. you may have noticed this yourself. the next time you are retelling a story, notice what you add, or what your brain wants to add, to the account. you may also notice that you drop certain details from previous tellings of the story. with individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. did you really break your mother's favorite vase when you were three? was that really your father throwing rocks into the river with you when you were seven? the human brain may be quite remarkable indeed. when it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture. part a and part b below contain one fill-in-the-blank to be used for all three question responses. your complete response must be in the format a, b, c including the letter choice, commas, and a space after the commas. part a: which of the following best explains why memories from childhood are unreliable? fill in blank 1 using a, b, or c. our brains add details and general knowledge to childhood memories. our brains are not as reliable as video cameras are. our brains create new stories to make the past more interesting. part b select one quotation from the text that supports your answer to part a. add your selection to blank 1 using e, f, or g. but the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall. to do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. select one quotation from the text that supports your answer to part a. add your selection to blank 1 using h, i, or j. documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. with individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. when it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture answer for blank 1: