People seem to feel that hiding behind technology gives them the right to forget their manners. Text messaging, emailing, and posting online
comments all remove the face-to-face element of social interactions. A
recent survey shows that 38 percent of comments on an online video-
sharing site are negative.
Which statement best evaluates the evidence used in the passage?
OA. The evidence is irrelevant because it does not have anything to do
with people using good manners.
O B. The evidence is relevant because it shows that people interacting
Oc. The evidence is relevant because it supports the idea that texting
O D. The evidence is irrelevant because it does not address the amount
through technology are often rude.
and emailing are more personal than posting comments online.
of positive interaction taking place through technology.

the answer would be "B"

Explanation:

the passage is talking about how people aren't being positive and kind with others, but  the first line says the passage is about negative interactions... the evidence and claim match up so the evidence is relevant

hope this helps :) also when given the chance, plz mark brainliest, thx

ok so like i went to wiki and looked up the (constitution x new "hammystan")and it showed me the picture it highlights new hampshire and says first and second session and than it says that they hit up the u.s and was like "ey dude that paper u sent us was adopted it bro thx" xd syays it all on wiki/the pic

i dont really like reading so i guess other people might not like reading either so   imma put the answer in bold italics

the correct answer is "dissent"

explanation:

because dissent is when one or more judges express disagreement with the majority in court, in specific legal systems.   an   argument in opposition is presented to the court, with a different interpretation, or application.