In at least 150 words, explain two ways in which Patrick Henry persuades his audience that the moment to fight is at hand. Identify two rhetorical techniques or appeals. Use evidence from the speech to support your response.

well this onw thing is 150 words ค้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ค้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้­้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎

ill help  

Explanation:

Patrick Henry was one of the leading orators of the Revolutionary generation, and in this speech, he certainly makes use of both appeals to reason and appeals to emotion. (Indeed, his argumentation here, even when it is logical, often has a highly emotional component to it.) He sees no room for compromise on this subject. This he establishes early on, when he declares it to be "a question of freedom or slavery." This, in itself, is a powerful piece of rhetoric: Henry frames this question around a clear bifurcation, organized around moral lines and extraordinary stakes.

Henry supports his position by referencing recent history with Great Britain:

you are going to have to give me more info

explanation:

based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32, i agree with the author of the passage "better is it that it takes longer to be angry than the strong " to the extent that i share the philosophy that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are very proud, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and do not constantly obfuscate or contain their feelings of anger, are strong people