subject
English, 16.12.2020 23:40 fatty18

In the first sentence of paragraph 3 (reproduced below), the writer is considering deleting the bolded text, adjusting the punctuation as necessary. Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, felow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, “since history and experience
prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republicaan government.”

Should the writer keep or delete the bolded text?
(text in “”)
A- Keep it, because it provides support for the writer's claim that these kinds of relationships are dangerous and harmful.
B- Keep it, because it presents evidence for the counterargument, showing that the writer has considered alternate perspectives.
C- Delete it, because it creates unnecessary wordiness and cutters an already lengthy and complicated sentence.
D- Delete it, because it contradicts the writer's overall argument which is developed later in the speech.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 23:00
What difference do you notice between this passage and contemporary pose.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:50
Chapters 3–5 while reading, think about… author’s purpose/point of view symbolism communication between characters —ethan frome
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:00
Based on this work of satire, what is most likely the authors opinion?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:30
Read the passage below and answer the question. jake was incredibly loquacious. he once gave a twenty minute monologue about his favorite movie. in the passage above, the context clue used to find the definition of loquacious is an example of an antonym an example a synonym the tone of the whole phrase
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the first sentence of paragraph 3 (reproduced below), the writer is considering deleting the bold...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.06.2020 15:01
Questions on the website: 13722367