The Russian Revolution Animal Farm

Russian Revolution

Karl Marx made speeches sharing his vision of communism.

Old Major says, “Man is our only real enemy. Remove Man from the scene, and the root cause of our hunger and overwork is abolished forever. (Orwell, 6)

Nicolas Romanov II is removed from power in Russia and taken into captivity.

Leaders of the Russian Revolution reduce the influence of the Russian Orthodox Church.

After the revolution succeeds, they change the name of the country from Russia to the U. S.S. R. / the Soviet Union.

The people of Soviet Union adopt a constitution based on Marx’s words.

They adopt a national anthem, “The Internationale.”

Some members of working class notice that they aren’t being rewarded for their labor as much under Stalin as they were under Nicolas Romanov.

The working class continue to produce a tremendous amount of labor and develop a strong work ethic.

Leon Trotsky devises several corporations and makes plans to educate the working class citizens of Russia.

Propaganda is used to explain to the working class why Stalin and his staff are prospering from their labor.

Stalin and Trotsky decide to work together and lead Russia, but there is tension between them.

Members of the upper class are worried about losing their amenities and possessions after the revolution succeeds.

Some members of the country never want to work and are always around to accept handouts.

Some members are cynical and show no signs of being impressed with the new regime and feel that nothing will ever change.

the answer is bags.

c. a group of tribes that formed a confederacy

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this

well there are a bunch of different possibilities so your gonna have to be a bit more specific