How can using a narrator help a filmmaker save money? Actors require more special privileges than narrators.
Audience members will pay more to see a film with a narrator than one without.
Narrators are paid a lot less money than the actors who act out scenes on camera.
Fewer scenes will need to be acted out if some parts are just explained or summarized.

answer: idk

explanation:

bc idk

the speech this question is referring to is president kennedy's special message to the congress on urgent national needs, may 25, 1961

kennedy responds in a very direct and concrete way to those thinking that communism is a positive system:

"yet their aggression is more often concealed than open. they have fired no missiles; and their troops are seldom seen. they send arms, agitators, aid, technicians and propaganda to every troubled area. but where fighting is required, it is usually done by others--by guerrillas striking at night, by assassins striking alone--assassins who have taken the lives of four thousand civil officers in the last twelve months in vietnam alone--by subversives and saboteurs and insurrectionists, who in some cases control whole areas inside of independent nations." (kennedy)

president kennedy presents communism as cowardly, as a hidden and treacherous weapon that strikes from the shadows like thieves, he represents the system as not even being capable of showing and open and overt attack or confrontation. to finish up the response, he expresses that the system attacks even a country's idependence and freedom.

omg omg omg that looks so so

explanation:

so cut i love it x3

and your question what topic are you in trouble with?