Chefs work in a small kitchen area, moving quickly. They need to keep up with a fast pace and adapt to meet the needs of customers. Chefs face pressure to satisfy customers, but they also get to be creative and experiment with new foods. Dancers work on large stages, moving around. They constantly have to perform for an audience and need to be comfortable in front of large groups of people. Dancers cannot be shy.

Both careers allow for creativity and self-expression. Both face pressure from their audience, but chefs tend to work in one place, while dancers may perform on many stages in many places. Chefs may not see their audiences directly, but dancers definitely do.

What makes this paragraph an example of subject-by-subject writing?

Being a chef is discussed, and then being a dancer is discussed, and then they are compared.
Dancing is discussed around one subject, and being a chef is discussed around another.
Dancing and cooking are compared around the same criteria as they are discussed.
Dancing and cooking are compared, and then the writer arrives at a conclusion.

"Being a chef is discussed, and then being a dancer is discussed, an then they are compared."

Explanation:

A "Subject by Subject" writing is when you write a paragraph on each topic. Some include many paragraphs though.

As a result, two subjects were written about. Then compared in the last paragraph.

Hope I could help!!

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

recommended becuase why did he read the book? becuase it was recommended