Think back to the last presentation or paper you wrote: What type of supporting material did you include? Why did you select the materials you included? Were the materials effective for your purpose? Why or why not?

Here's what I would put:

Explanation: The last essay I wrote was an argumentative essay debating whether or not juvenile offenders should be tried as adults in the legal system. To support my claims, I cited evidence from news sources, official legal documents and published opinion pieces regarding the matter. I included the citations as a solid way to defend my stance because it gave my paper more credibility and validation. I included opinion pieces from the opposing side so my work wouldn't seem one-dimensional by offering different perspectives on the  issue and effectively dismissing them and proving mine to be the most logical.

which one is underlined?

ian mortimer in his book "the time traveller's guide to elizabethan england" uses a narrative in his style, which successfully conveys a clear description of the life in england in the 16th century. he writes in second person, which makes it comfortable to reader and easy to understand, he captures the readers attention with views of the landscape, the streets, the people including rich and poor. he also depicts some cultural traits from how people behave, eat or what they wear. his descriptions range from the social, economical, the political power to the examples of the life of common people. it could be tell that this book is about social history rather than a   novel.