HEL How might an author’s point of view become the focus of a collaborative discussion?

A teacher might say that some comments in the discussion are inappropriate.

One participant might incorrectly describe an author’s writing style.

Some participants might suggest that information in the article is inaccurate.

Several participants might disagree about how biased an author seems.

let's think

what are some attributes about yourself that has changed?

have you had goals that you've been trying to reach, goals you've thrown away?

how do you view your character; what or who has changed it?

what stories do you have about people or things that have changed you?

has religion changed you? an exciting event?

do you believe life has an adventure in store? do you believe it's meaningless?

try to answer questions about yourself.

ok then i guess ill just randomly post this comment

1

abominable dr. phibes

1: 42

2

american psycho

2: 07

3

speak of the devil

1: 48

4

walk among us

1: 23

5

the hunger

1: 43

6

from hell they came

7

dig up her bones

3: 02

8

blacklight

1: 28

9

resurrection

1: 30

10

dead kings rise

3: 05

11

this island earth

2: 15

12

crimson ghost

2: 01

13

day of the dead

1: 50

14

the haunting

1: 26

15

mars attacks

2: 28

16

hate the living, love the dead

1: 37

17

shining

3: 00

18

don’t open ’til doomsday / hellnight

7: 58