Write an essay that analyzes how a text explains the sequence of events that affected the discovery of the Rosetta stone. Napoleon Bonaparte campaigned in Egypt with the intention of dominating the East Mediterranean and threatening the British hold on India. The story of the discovery of the Rosetta Stone most generally accepted is that it was found by accident by soldiers in Napoleon’s army. They discovered the Rosetta Stone on 15 July 1799 while digging the foundations of an addition to a fort near the town of Rashid (Rosetta) in the Nile Delta. It had apparently been built into a very old wall. The officer in charge, Pierre-François Bouchard, realized the importance of the discovery and they just kept ondigging non stop until they found it
i need more information please

Explanation:

Hi - so there are a couple of ways you can sequence events in a nonfiction narrative.  You can use the reporter's formulas of Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How which details the essential facts of the history in this case of the Rosetta Stone.  You could combine it with another outline I use for narrative writing that may help get those key events into a timeline of sorts.  

First moment  

next moment

then the next moment

final moment  

It kind of mirrors a timeline of sorts.  With this, you need to set up a bit of background of why this was such an important find.  Why was it important in the world at the time?  How did it change the world after it's discovery and such.  I'd add important names and places, but not every name or place if they are just fillers.  

Napoleon Bonaparte campaigned in Egypt with the intention of dominating the East Mediterranean and threatening the British hold on India. The story of the discovery of the Rosetta Stone most generally accepted is that it was found by accident by soldiers in Napoleon’s army. They discovered the Rosetta Stone on 15 July 1799 while digging the foundations of an addition to a fort near the town of Rashid (Rosetta) in the Nile Delta. It had apparently been built into a very old wall. The officer in charge, Pierre-François Bouchard, realized the importance of the discovery.

Explanation:

Is what I found prolly not enough but... yea.

Which facts can be used to support the opinion that the researchers were helped oooy France’s war with England? Select all the answers that apply.

“Napoleon’s main “French soldiers were tearing down a ruined wall . . . when they came upon the slab.”Explanation: