What is the best summary of the paragraph? A.
Roman aquaducts were constructed to move water from the mountains to the cities of the Empire that could be up to 60 miles away. Once in the cities, the water was used to clean the streets and prevent the spread of disease.
B.
Roman aquaducts could be 60 miles long and moved cold spring water from the mountains into the cities. Without this water, the streets of the cities would have been filthy with overflowing sewers, and diseases would have spread.
C.
Roman aquaducts are a marvel of modern engineering and architecture. They could be up to 60 miles long and were made up of graceful arches. They were used to carry water through the Roman Empire.
D.
Roman aquaducts are a marvel of modern engineering and architecture. The aquaducts moved water from the mountains to cities, which kept the Roman cities clean by removing refuse and preventing diseases from spreading.

The arctic national wildlife refuge is home to caribou, moose, musk oxen, wolves, foxes, grizzlies, polar bears and migratory birds. leaders in the oil industry believe the refuge is the perfect site for the “environmentally sensitive exploration” of oil. environmentalists are wondering: what will become of the wildlife? president george w. bush, oil-industry leaders and others believe that americans will benefit from the oil that lies under the snow-filled surface of the refuge. in their opinion, the oil will reduce high fuel prices and decrease our need for oil from other countries. i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? americans are the largest consumers of oil. instead of drilling for oil, we should decrease our need for foreign oil simply by using less. we must all work together to cut back on the oil we use in order to preserve the wildlife of the arctic national wildlife refuge. what type of argument is used in this paragraph? i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? a. appeal to emotion c. appeal to logic b. bandwagon d. none of the above select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d