One of the key questions historical criticism attempts to answer is: what are the author's attitudes toward people?

true

false

I believe that the answer to the question: One of the key questions historical criticism attempts to answer is: What are the author´s attitudes toward people, would be, false.

Explanation:  

Historical criticism, also known as the historical-critical method is described as  a branch of criticism that focuses on interpreting, analyzing and understanding ancient texts, and the world depicted through them, so as to understand better the meaning behind it, the reasons for the messages in these texts, the context for both the author and the audience of the time, and if possible, to understand the circumstances faced by societies at the time the texts were written. It is almost like getting a glimpse of the past through these texts, and understanding the meaning of words, messages, and imagery in them, through understanding the world under which they were born. This is done particularly with ancient Christian and Jewish texts although it has also been applied to others. However, it is not part of the process of historical criticism to understand the attitude of the author towards people. This is why it is a false statement.

idk i just need the points