In the space below, write a five-paragraph, 600-800 word persuasive essay arguing whether or not your chosen speech is effective in communicating its message, based on how it uses rhetorical strategies.
Include a clear thesis statement identifying whether in your view, the speaker's argument is effective, based on his or
her use of rhetorical strategies. Explain why or why not. Give your audience a sense of closure by providing a clear
conclusion
Throughout the essay, be sure to:
• use formal, objective language for an academic audience,
• connect your ideas using transitions that clearly tie together your ideas,
• base your argument on evidence from the text of the speech, and
• provide a clear conclusion about the speech's effectiveness.
Click here to view the rubric for this assignment.

Did you ever get an answer for this or submit it if so could you please give it to me? I’m in need of it I’m failing right now because of it :(

ha

Explanation:

answer: d.she abandons people when they least expect it.

in the monk's tale, we encounter seventeen stories that relate historical events. all of these stories have tragic commonalities. they tell the stories of heroes who, despite their success in life, all met sad ends. the monk blames these sad outcomes on fortune. one of fortune's traits is that she abandons people when they least expect it. this is one of the most common themes of medieval tragedies.

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.