Ambiguity. Was Nathaniel Hawthorne a feminist, misogynist or just an objective chronicler of the Puritan Era? Choose one approach. Look at the female characters in the novel: Hester, Mistress Hibbins, Pearl, and the “marketplace women.” Provide textual evidence to support your opinion. You must be consistent. If he is a feminist, then prove it with each character/group. If he is a misogynist, then prove it with each character/group. If he is chronicling the time period with different “types” of females, then prove that., but for what purpose? Textual evidence (quote the text with page numbers). Four separate evidence paragraphs for each category (no need for intro and conclusion.)

Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”

How did the man from "to build a fire" put his life in danger?

What inferences can be made about odysseus based on his choice to stay and see the cyclops?