Is the following definition of complementary reversible? if yes, write it as a true biconditional. complementary angles are two angles whose sum measures to 90 degrees
a. this statement is not reversible
b. yes, if angles are complementary, than their sum measures to 90 degrees
c. yes, angles are complementary if (and only if) their sum measures to 90 degrees
d. yes, angles are complementary if their sum measures to 90 degrees 4. which biconditional is not a good definition?
a. a whole number is odd if and only if the number is not divisible by 2.
b. an angle is straight if and only if its measure is 180.
c. a whole number is even if and only if it is divisible by 2
d. a ray is a bisector of an angle if and only if it splits the angle into two angles.

Question 1: The answer is c. Yes, angles are complementary if (and only if) their sum measures to 90 degrees.

This definition of complementary is reversible because both parts of the sentence, whatever order they are put, are true. And we can be sure of it, when rewriting the sentence into both conditional statement and conditional converse. Both conditionals, have a part of a sentence that is called "hypothesis" and other that is called "conclusion".

When both sentences in the conditional and in the converse are true, then it is can be a biconditional sentence. Furthermore, the general structure of this type of sentence is First clause + If (and only if) + Second clause.

Question 2: The answer is d. a ray is a bisector of an angle if and only if it splits the angle into two angles.

A ray is a bisector of an angle only when the line segment splits the angle into two equal parts.

answer:   a good wench, give it me.

iago

good girl, give it to me.

emilia

what will you do with ’t, that you have been so earnest

325to have me filch it?

emilia

and what are you going to do with it? why did you want it so much that you begged me to steal it?

iago

  why, what is that to you?

iago

what’s it to you?

emilia

if it be not for some purpose of import,

give ’t me again. poor lady, she’ll run mad

when she shall lack it.

emilia

if you don’t need it for some important reason, then give it back to me. poor lady, she’ll go crazy when she sees it’s missing.

iago

be not acknown on ’t,

330i have use for it. go, leave me.

iago

don’t admit to knowing anything about it. i need it. now go, leave me.

exit emilia

emilia exits.

i will in cassio’s lodging lose this napkin

and let him find it. trifles light as air

are to the jealous confirmations strong

as proofs of holy writ. this may do something.

335the moor already changes with my poison.

dangerous conceits are in their natures poisons

which at the first are scarce found to distaste,

but with a little act upon the blood

burn like the mines of sulfur.

i’ll leave this handkerchief at cassio’s house and let him find it.to a jealous man, a meaningless little thing like this looks like absolute proof. this handkerchief may be useful to me. the moor’s mind has already become infected with my poisonous suggestions. ideas can be like poisons. at first they hardly even taste bad, but once they get into your blood they start burning like hot lava.

enter othello

othello enters.

    i did say so.

340look, where he comes. not poppy nor mandragora

nor all the drowsy syrups of the world,

shall ever medicine thee to that sweet sleep

which thou owedst yesterday.

here he comes. no drugs or sleeping pills will ever give you the restful sleep that you had last night.

othello

    ha! ha! false to me?

othello

argh! she’s cheating on me?

iago

why, how now, general? no more of that.

iago

oh, general, , no more of that!

explanation: