Writing an Essay to Compare the Presentation of Ideas across Genres Drafting
Pre-Writing Rough Draft Final Draht
Active
וקטור
Albo
Award-winning author Sonia Nazario is best known for her Pulitzer Prize-winning biography Enrique's Journey. The book brings to life the
very real and dangerous journey of a Honduran boy fleeing his home in hopes of finding his mother in America. In addition to the
biography. Nazario has written countless articles informing readers of the dangers children like Enrique face. While the biography and the
articles serve the same purpose and present the same ideas, they do so in different ways. You will be comparing and contrasting how
Nazario informs her audience through a biography and an editorial. You may access the editorial here and the biography here.
Write a comparative essay in which you compare and contrast the way Sonia Nazario presents similar ideas in a biography and an
editorial. Support your comparison with well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient evidence from both texts. Apply MLA guidelines to properly
cite the evidence used in your essay. Be sure your essay uses formal and objective language,
Somebody please help on writing this essay I really need help on this ASAP

Nazario is a writer very committed to the truth of the information she is divulging and for that reason, she decided to inform about Enrique's life through two different media, which complement each other and leave her work alive and very efficient in conveying a message. . These media are biography and editorial.

In the biography, Nazario presents the story in an importional way, showing the facts that happened in Enrique's life, the historical context where he was inserted and how it affected the story. In this type of media, Nazario presents true information without taking a position on them and highlighting the most important points in the story that is told in a literal way.

In the editorial, however, Nazario's narrative changes, but it is as efficient as before. In the editorial, she briefly presents Enrique's story, counting on the opinions and thoughts she has about each event narrated. Here the text is not impartial and shows the author's perception of the facts, effects and events that the story presents.

the third answer

explanation:

because

1. drag the central argument paine presents and its two claims to complete the chart. argument claims america may have flourished more had it not been under the power of any european country. america may have flourished under britain in the past, but there is no guarantee that it will continue to flourish in the future. america will continue to flourish as long as the essential food products it sells are bought and eaten in europe. the american colonies will no longer flourish when britain makes war against them. britain's king has shown himself to be prejudiced against the colonies, rather than wanting them to flourish.

2.select the sentence in this passage that can be classified as a false statement.

although few humans per year are attacked by polar bears, any individual attack can be terrifying and even fatal. the warming of arctic regions has allowed the intrusion of humans into the polar bears’ habitat, increasing the danger of harmful contacts. remaining alert and using precautions can humans avoid a negative encounter with a polar bear. traveling together and staying close to the group can humans avoid bear attacks. certain weapons, including nonlethal ones such as pepper spray, are effective against polar bears. once a bear has decided to attack, however, nothing can be done.

3.select the sentence in this passage that demonstrates the fallacy of making an extreme either-or claim.

the civil war was the bloodiest conflict in the history of the united states. more than 600,000 soldiers lost their lives. the fighting took place in many different cities and throughout the countryside. the wounded often suffered acute pain while in the field hospitals. they all should have asked for better care. william hammond, the surgeon general of the union army, created a new system of sanitary field care. if people do not accept hammond as the most important person from the civil war, they have no understanding of the war.