Robinson is using the web below to organize his ideas for his essay about the aftermath of the 1871 Chicago fire. One of his sources is The Great Fire by Jim Murphy. A circle is labeled Great Chicago Fire: The Aftermath. 3 circles are connected to this main circle. The first is labeled Restoring the city. The second is labeled Analyzing what happened. The third is labeled Individual stories.

Which detail belongs in the analyzing area of the web?

a) At the official inquiry after the fire, it was established that there were several missed chances to stop the fire.
b) There were hundreds of people who chose to watch the fire instead of help when it first started.
c) Many construction workers and builders came to the city after the fire to find work.
Joseph Chamberlin was a reporter who risked his life to cover the fire, and so he witnessed the mass panic.
d) Joseph Chamberlin was a reporter who risked his life to cover the fire, and so he witnessed the mass panic.

the answer is most likely c. it shows us that the rules that the pigs make can change on a whim whenever it suits the pigs purpose.

hope this

where are the anwsers

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.