HOW effective is the first paragraph in engaging the reader on the topic of Goodall? (A)
Effective; including background information provides necessary details that
are referenced throughout the rest of the article.
Effective; providing direct quotes helps the reader deeply understand
Goodall's goals and hints at how she achieved them.
(B)
(C)
Ineffective; stating that Goodall "dreamt as a boy" suggests that the article
will be about Goodall's fight as a female scientist, which it is not.
(D)
Ineffective; listening too many facts about Goodall confuses the main point
because readers are not given a clear focus.

the correct answer will be d or c for me it may be different

you should start by saying what they did to these subjects hope that this

sorry forgo thte passage

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.