Which piece of evidence from source 1 most conflicts with Zeke's claim that he did all his chores?
SOURCE 1: Email from Zeke Granger: I totally did all my chores, I
swear! I got your list at 9:00 this morning and finished by noon. Yes, I
know Mrs. Rodriquez saw me out cruising in the car, but that was after
noon. I had finished my chores by then, so what's the big deal?
SOURCE 2: List of Chores for Zeke: 1. Clean dead leaves and sludge
out of the gutters. 2. Do laundry, separate the dark colors from the
light colors and use bleach on the whites. 3. Take the tires off the car
so they can be recycled. (I'll pick them up at 4:00.) 4. Give the picket
fence a fresh coat of lime green paint.
O
A. I had finished my chores by then, so what's the big deal?
B. I got your list at 9:00 this morning and finished by noon.
C. Mrs. Rodriquez saw me out cruising in the car
O
D. I totally did all my chores, I swear!

C. Mrs. Rodriquez saw me out cruising in the car

Explanation:

i believe this is the answer because in source two, number three says ¨take the tires off the car so they can be recycled (ill pick them up at 4:00.)¨

If Zeke had finished all of his chores, he wouldnt have been driving the car if he was told to take off the tires.

please mark me brainliest :)

i hope you have a nice day/night

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.

ok if it wasn't the hans one it was probably c or he thought the mountain was collapsing on them.